HPPE and steel composite PU palm coated cut resistant gloves rated TDM Cut Level F under ISO 13997, the maximum cut protection achievable under EN388:2016, built for knife handling, blade room work, heavy glass fabrication, and sheet steel processing where no lower cut level is acceptable.
- TDM Cut Level F: maximum EN388:2016 cut protection, 30N straight-blade resistance under ISO 13997
- EN388:2016+A1:2018 rated 4444F: all four mechanical test positions at Level 4, the only MAX glove to complete the Coupe blade test at Level 4
- HPPE steel composite liner: HDPE, glass fibre, steel, nylon, and spandex for maximum cut and mechanical protection
- Level 4 puncture resistance: 150N, the maximum EN388 puncture rating
- PU palm coating for dry grip on sharp components and cutting materials
- Supplied in packs of 12
HPPE and steel composite PU palm coated cut resistant gloves rated TDM Cut Level F under ISO 13997, the maximum cut protection achievable under EN388:2016, built for knife handling, blade room work, heavy glass fabrication, and sheet steel processing where no lower cut level is acceptable.
- TDM Cut Level F: maximum EN388:2016 cut protection, 30N straight-blade resistance under ISO 13997
- EN388:2016+A1:2018 rated 4444F: all four mechanical test positions at Level 4, the only MAX glove to complete the Coupe blade test at Level 4
- HPPE steel composite liner: HDPE, glass fibre, steel, nylon, and spandex for maximum cut and mechanical protection
- Level 4 puncture resistance: 150N, the maximum EN388 puncture rating
- PU palm coating for dry grip on sharp components and cutting materials
- Supplied in packs of 12
MAX HPPE Steel Composite PU Palm Coated Cut Resistant Gloves - Cut Level F
HPPE and steel composite PU palm coated cut resistant gloves rated TDM Cut Level F under ISO 13997, delivering the maximum cut protection achievable under EN388:2016 at 30 Newtons straight-blade resistance. Designed for knife handling operatives, blade room workers, heavy glass fabricators, sheet steel processors, and any other professional application where the task risk assessment identifies a cut hazard level that TDM Level E cannot adequately address. The SCRSF carries the EN388:2016 rating of 4444F, a rating profile that distinguishes it from every competitor Level F PU glove currently available in the UK market. Where most TDM Level F PU gloves carry an X in the second position of the EN388 code, indicating the Coupe rotating blade test was not conducted, the SCRSF completed the Coupe test successfully at Level 4. The fourth position is also Level 4 at 150 Newtons puncture resistance, the maximum achievable EN388 puncture result. All four mechanical test positions are at Level 4 or above, with TDM Level F in the fifth position. The PU palm coating applies a thin, non-porous grip surface across the palm and front of fingers, maintaining the tactile sensitivity needed for precise handling alongside the maximum available cut protection.
Why 4444F is stronger than 4X43F and what it means for your specification
The EN388:2016 rating code has five positions. Every position tells a buyer something different about the glove's protection profile. The second position is the Coupe rotating blade test result. Most composite HPPE and steel liners at TDM Level F blunt the Coupe test blade before a valid result is obtained, producing an X in the second position. An X is not a failed test but it does mean the Coupe result is unknown. The SCRSF liner completed the Coupe test at Level 4, requiring a blade cut index of 10.0 before the blade penetrated the material. The fourth position is puncture resistance. Most TDM Level F PU gloves in the UK market reach Level 3 (100N). The SCRSF reaches Level 4 (150N), the maximum achievable. For a procurement team or safety officer specifying to the highest available standard, the 4444F rating is the confirmation that this glove has been tested and passed at the maximum or near-maximum level across every mechanical protection category, not just the TDM cut test.
Key Features
TDM Cut Level F: maximum EN388:2016 cut protection: ISO 13997 straight-blade test at 30 Newtons resistance before blade penetration. This is the highest cut protection achievable under EN388:2016 and is appropriate for knife handling, blade room work, heavy glass fabrication, sheet steel processing, and any application where the risk assessment confirms no lower TDM level is sufficient.
EN388 4444F rating: all four mechanical positions at Level 4: The SCRSF is the only glove in the MAX cut range to complete the Coupe rotating blade test with a confirmed result (Level 4, index 10.0). Puncture resistance also reaches Level 4 (150N), the maximum achievable EN388 puncture result. Abrasion resistance and tear resistance both at Level 4. A genuinely stronger all-round mechanical protection profile than 4X43F-rated competitors.
HPPE steel composite liner: Five-material composite of HDPE, glass fibre, steel, nylon, and spandex. The HDPE and steel deliver TDM Level F at 30 Newtons. The glass fibre contributes the Coupe Level 4 result and abrasion resistance. The nylon provides tear resistance and structure. The spandex maintains stretch and close fit for dexterity throughout extended production and site shifts.
Level 4 puncture resistance: Rated at 150 Newtons, the maximum EN388 puncture result. For applications involving sharp tool points, wire ends, and needle-like projections from fabricated components, Level 4 puncture resistance provides the highest available protection against non-blade puncture hazards alongside the TDM Level F cut rating.
PU palm coating for dry grip: Thin, non-porous polyurethane applied across the palm and front of fingers delivers consistent dry grip on sharp components, sheet materials, blades, and cutting tools alongside the maximum available cut protection. Maintains tactile sensitivity for precision handling tasks.
Breathable uncoated back: Knitted back of hand and fingers left uncoated for heat and moisture management during sustained production and site wear, maintaining operative comfort and glove compliance across extended shifts.
Who is this for
Trades and roles:
-
Knife handling and blade room operatives
-
Heavy glass fabricators and glaziers
-
Sheet steel and metal processing workers
-
Construction operatives on maximum cut-hazard tasks
-
Waste management and recycling operatives handling mixed sharp streams
Industries:
-
Food processing and knife handling
-
Heavy glass and glazing fabrication
-
Sheet steel and metal processing
-
Automotive manufacturing and stamping
-
Waste management and recycling
Specifications
| Specification | Detail |
|---|---|
| Product Name | MAX HPPE Steel Composite PU Palm Coated Cut Resistant Gloves - TDM Cut Level F |
| SKU / Product Code | SCRSF |
| Glove Category | HPPE steel composite PU palm coated cut resistant glove |
| EN Standard | EN388:2016+A1:2018 |
| EN388 Rating | 4444F — all four mechanical positions at Level 4 |
| Abrasion Resistance | Level 4 (8000 cycles — maximum rating) |
| Blade Cut Resistance (Coupe) | Level 4 (index 10.0) — Coupe test completed successfully |
| Tear Resistance | Level 4 (75N — maximum rating) |
| Puncture Resistance | Level 4 (150N — maximum rating) |
| TDM Cut Resistance (ISO 13997) | Level F — 30N straight-blade resistance (maximum achievable) |
| Impact Protection | Not tested |
| Certification Marks | CE marked, Category II |
| Liner Composition | HDPE, glass fibre, steel, nylon, spandex |
| Liner Gauge | 13 gauge |
| Coating Type | Polyurethane (PU) |
| Coating Coverage | Palm coated — palm and front of fingers |
| Grip Environment | Dry conditions |
| Back of Hand | Uncoated breathable knitted |
| Cuff Type | Elasticated knitted, colour-coded by size |
| Pack Quantity | 12 pairs |
| Colour | Grey marl HPPE composite liner, black PU coating |
How SCRSF compares to other MAX cut resistant gloves
| pecification | SCRSG (Level C) | SCRSE (Level E) | SCRSF (Level F) |
|---|---|---|---|
| EN388 Rating | 4X43C | 4X43E | 4444F |
| TDM Cut Level | C (10N) | E (22N) | F (30N — maximum) |
| Coupe Blade Test | X (not conducted) | X (not conducted) | Level 4 (completed) |
| Puncture Resistance | Level 3 (100N) | Level 3 (100N) | Level 4 (150N — maximum) |
| Tear Resistance | Level 4 | Level 4 | Level 4 |
| Abrasion Resistance | Level 4 | Level 4 | Level 4 |
Compatibility
| Application / Condition | Status |
|---|---|
| Knife handling and blade room work | ✓ Compatible — TDM Cut Level F rated |
| Heavy glass fabrication and sheet glass handling | ✓ Compatible — TDM Cut Level F rated |
| Sheet steel and metal processing | ✓ Compatible — TDM Cut Level F rated |
| Automotive stamping and press work component handling | ✓ Compatible |
| Waste management and sharp mixed-stream sorting | ✓ Compatible |
| Maximum cut-hazard construction and demolition | ✓ Compatible |
| Powered cutting tools: grinders, saws, blades | ✗ Not suitable — no glove protects against powered cutting tools |
| Sustained wet or waterproof handling | ✗ Not recommended — palm coated only |
| Chemical immersion or splash | ✗ Not recommended — no EN374 rating |
| Heat or flame exposure | ✗ Not recommended — no EN407 rating |
| Needle-stick or hypodermic puncture hazards | ✗ Not recommended — EN388 puncture is not needle-stick rated |
Who is this for
HPPE steel composite PU palm coated cut resistant gloves at TDM Cut Level F are used primarily by knife handling operatives, blade room workers, heavy glass fabricators, sheet steel processors, and automotive manufacturing workers where the task risk assessment confirms TDM Level E is insufficient for the specific cut hazard profile. The 4444F rating makes these gloves the highest-rated all-round mechanical protection option in the MAX cut range. At 30 Newtons TDM resistance, they are specified where frequent contact with very sharp cutting edges, heavy glass sheets, or thin metal stampings creates a sustained maximum-level cut risk throughout the production shift. Waste management and recycling operatives sorting mixed sharp streams where glass, metal, and cutting tool components are handled simultaneously will find the combination of Level F cut resistance and Level 4 puncture resistance addresses both blade and probe-type hazards in one glove. Safety officers and procurement teams specifying the highest available cut protection for a workforce will find the 4444F rating provides confirmation that all four mechanical test positions have been completed and passed at maximum or near-maximum levels, not just the TDM cut test.
Typical applications
Knife handling and blade room work in food processing, manufacturing, and industrial environments where operatives handle, clean, sharpen, or store bladed tools and the TDM Level F rating provides the maximum available protection against incidental blade contact throughout the task.
Heavy glass sheet handling and fabrication in glazing, architectural glass processing, and industrial glass manufacturing where large, heavy glass sheets with sharp cut edges present a maximum-level cut risk during carrying, positioning, and installation.
Sheet steel and metal stamping component handling in automotive, engineering, and heavy manufacturing environments where press-formed components, stamped sections, and thin sheet metal edges present sharp, consistent cut hazards throughout the production cycle.
Waste management and recycling sorting operations where mixed waste streams containing glass fragments, metal offcuts, bladed tools, and sharp construction materials create an unpredictable maximum-level cut and puncture hazard for sorting operatives.
Demolition and strip-out tasks on construction sites where the hazard profile includes broken glass, sharp metal fixings, blade tools, and cut sheet materials in conditions where the risk assessment has identified TDM Level E as insufficient.
Automotive and aerospace component handling in manufacturing environments where precision-stamped metal components, composite edge materials, and sharp-edged fabricated sections create a sustained high-cut-risk profile across the production shift.
How to use
Step 1: Select the correct size using colour-coded cuffs. At 13 gauge, correct sizing maintains the close fit essential for both cut protection performance and tactile sensitivity.
Step 2: Inspect the PU coating and composite liner before each use. Check the palm and fingertip area for visible wear, thinning, or damage. Do not use a glove where the liner shows damage or the PU coating is cracked, as cut protection is compromised once the liner integrity is broken.
Step 3: Pull the glove fully over the hand, ensuring all fingers are completely seated with the PU coating covering the full palm and front of fingers. No bunching should be visible at the fingertips.
Step 4: Seat the elasticated knitted cuff flat against the wrist before beginning work.
Step 5: After use, wipe with a damp cloth to remove debris and contamination. Do not launder or dry-clean: performance levels are rated for new condition only.
Step 6: Air dry fully before storing. Store away from direct sunlight, heat sources, and ozone.
Step 7: Replace when the PU coating shows visible thinning or cracking, when the composite liner shows wear at the fingertips or palm, or when cut protection can no longer be confirmed by visual inspection.
Common mistakes
Using TDM Level F where the risk assessment only requires Level C or E: Over-specifying cut protection is as problematic as under-specifying. A TDM Level F composite liner is stiffer and less dextrous than a Level C or E liner by virtue of the additional material required to achieve 30 Newtons resistance. Specifying Level F for tasks that only require Level C reduces operative dexterity and increases glove cost without delivering additional safety value for the actual hazard. Always confirm the required TDM level from the task risk assessment before specifying.
Assuming cut-resistant means cut-proof against powered tools: TDM Level F means the glove resisted a straight blade at 30 Newtons before penetration in a controlled laboratory test. Powered cutting tools including angle grinders, saws, and rotating blades will cut through any glove. Never use any cut-resistant glove as protection against powered cutting equipment.
Treating EN388 puncture Level 4 as needle-stick protection: The Level 4 puncture result (150N) reflects resistance to a blunt probe under the EN388 test method. It does not confer protection against hypodermic needles or fine-diameter sharp points. Where needle-stick risk is present, a specifically rated glove must be specified.
Using on wet or contaminated surfaces: PU coating performs in dry conditions. On oily or wet surfaces, PU loses grip traction. For applications where TDM Level F cut protection is required alongside grip in wet or oily conditions, a foam nitrile or sandy nitrile cut Level F alternative should be evaluated.
Washing or dry cleaning: Performance levels are rated for new condition only. Wipe with a damp cloth and air dry. Never launder.
Safety
These gloves are certified to EN388:2016+A1:2018 (4444F), CE marked Category II. TDM Cut Level F provides 30 Newtons straight-blade resistance under ISO 13997 and is the maximum cut protection achievable under EN388:2016. These gloves do not protect against powered cutting tools, heat, flame, chemical immersion, or needle-stick hazards. Do not use near moving machinery due to the entanglement hazard noted in the user instructions. The EN388 puncture resistance Level 4 (150N) is not needle-stick protection. A task-specific risk assessment under the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 must confirm that TDM Level F is the appropriate specification for the actual cut hazard and that no additional protection types are required for the task.
Maintenance
Wipe with a damp cloth after use to remove debris and contamination. Air dry fully at room temperature before storing. Store in dry conditions away from direct sunlight, heat sources, and ozone. Inspect the PU coating and composite liner before every use. Replace when the coating or liner shows visible damage, thinning, or wear, or when cut protection can no longer be confirmed by visual inspection.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What makes the 4444F rating different from the 4X43F rating carried by most TDM Level F gloves?
A: The EN388 rating code has five positions. The second position is the Coupe rotating blade test result. Most TDM Level F composite gloves carry an X in this position, meaning the Coupe test was not conducted because the composite liner blunted the test blade before a valid result was obtained. The SCRSF completed the Coupe test successfully at Level 4, requiring a blade cut index of 10.0 before penetration. The fourth position is puncture resistance: most TDM Level F PU gloves reach Level 3 (100N), whilst the SCRSF reaches Level 4 (150N), the maximum achievable. For a safety officer or procurement manager specifying to the highest available standard, 4444F confirms all four mechanical test positions have been completed and passed at maximum levels, not just the TDM cut test alone.
Q: What does the EN388 rating 4444F mean digit by digit?
A: EN388:2016+A1:2018 rates gloves across five positions. The first digit (4) is abrasion resistance at the maximum Level 4, meaning the coating withstood 8000 rub cycles before failure. The second digit (4) is the Coupe rotating blade test at Level 4, index 10.0, meaning the Coupe blade required 10 times the reference force to cut the material. The third digit (4) is tear resistance at the maximum Level 4, requiring 75 Newtons of force. The fourth digit (4) is puncture resistance at the maximum Level 4, rated at 150 Newtons. The fifth position (F) is the TDM straight-blade cut result under ISO 13997 at 30 Newtons, the maximum achievable cut protection level under EN388:2016.
Q: What are these gloves NOT suitable for?
A: These gloves provide TDM Cut Level F maximum mechanical protection for dry construction, fabrication, and industrial tasks. They must not be used with powered cutting tools: no glove provides protection against grinders, saws, or rotating blades. They are palm-coated only and not suitable for sustained wet handling. The EN388 puncture Level 4 result is not needle-stick protection. They carry no EN374 chemical or EN407 heat protection rating. Do not use near moving machinery. Always confirm from the task risk assessment that TDM Level F is the required specification and that no additional protection types are needed for the specific task.
Q: When should I specify TDM Level F rather than Level E?
A: The task risk assessment determines the required TDM level. TDM Level E (22N) is appropriate for most glass handling, sheet metal fabrication, and blade-adjacent work. TDM Level F (30N) should be specified when the risk assessment identifies: knife handling or blade room work where direct contact with sharp edges is frequent and deliberate; heavy glass processing where the weight and size of glass sheets increases cut force beyond what Level E provides; sheet steel or thin metal stamping components with extremely sharp press-formed edges; or any environment where a previous lower TDM level has been identified as insufficient following a cut injury review.
Q: Is the PU coating suitable for wet glass and metal handling?
A: PU coating performs reliably in dry conditions. On wet glass, oily metal surfaces, or contaminated work areas, PU loses traction and grip reliability. If the application involves wet glass handling, metal components with cutting oil, or oily production surfaces, a foam nitrile or sandy nitrile cut Level F alternative should be evaluated for its wet grip performance alongside the TDM Level F rating. For dry glass and metal handling, PU maintains consistent grip and tactile sensitivity throughout the working shift.
Q: How does the SCRSF compare with the SCRSE in terms of dexterity and fit?
A: Both gloves are 13-gauge composites with PU palm coating and breathable uncoated backs. The SCRSF liner contains HDPE, glass fibre, steel, nylon, and spandex, whilst the SCRSE liner contains PE, steel yarn, glass fibre, spandex, and polyester inner facing. The additional material required to reach TDM Level F means the SCRSF liner is marginally stiffer than the SCRSE. For most handling tasks this difference is not operationally significant, but for applications where maximum dexterity is as important as maximum cut protection, the task risk assessment should confirm whether TDM Level F is genuinely required or whether TDM Level E at 22 Newtons is sufficient for the actual hazard.
Q: Is puncture resistance Level 4 the same as needle-stick protection?
A: No. EN388 puncture resistance Level 4 (150N) is measured using a blunt standardised probe under increasing force until the probe penetrates the glove material. It reflects resistance to sharp tool points, wire ends, and similar industrial puncture hazards. It does not replicate the sharpness, diameter, or penetration dynamics of a hypodermic needle. Where needle-stick risk is present alongside cut hazard, a glove specifically certified for needle-stick protection under EN ISO 23388 must be specified.
Q: Why source these maximum cut resistant gloves from CMT Group?
A: MAX is a CMT Group own brand. Large UK stock holdings across the full cut range, from Level C through to Level F, mean procurement teams can specify multiple cut levels for different workforce tasks from a single supplier with no backorders. Order by 7pm for next-day delivery nationwide via CMT's own fleet covering over 95% of the UK mainland. The EDGE portal provides agreed pricing, role-based spending controls, and full delivery tracking for contract customers managing cut PPE across multiple sites.







